5 Deadly Spanish Inquisition Jesuits!!

Each one of the following deadly Jesuits was born and lived all their lives in Great Britain. The Spanish Inquisition loves to use Protestant countries as surrogotes or pawns in order to cenceal her real identity!!

The first of the fatal 5 is Erasmus Darwin:

# 2 is vaccinator Edward Jenner

# 3 is Charles (ape-man) Darwin

(1) Antichrist was one man . . . not a dynasty.  

(2) He would be an atheist or infidel.

(3) He would not be revealed until 7 years before the end of time.

(4) He would sit in a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem.

(5) He would call himself God etc., etc.

This became the official Roman Catholic position on Antichrist. This new idea very conveniently shifted the focus from the Papacy to some fanciful individual way off in the distant future.

Ribera's commentary was popularized by a book written by another Jesuit named Emanuel Lacunza entitled The Coming of the Messiah in Power and Glory. This book was translated into English by another follower of Darby named Edward Irving.

In order to make this Jesuit "interpretation of prophecy" self-fulfilling, the Vatican had to invent Jews and somehow get them back to Palestine. This they did by starting World War I and II and creating the State of Israel.

Futurism also teaches that Jesus failed to establish His earthly kingdom at His first coming and had to postpone it until his return. When Jesus was accused before Pilate the charge was: calling himself a king in opposition to Caesar.

Jesus denied such a charge when he said:

"My kingdom is not of this world" (John 18:36).

Pilate believed him and declared him innocent of that charge. Futurists however say that Jesus was using equivocation e.g. not telling the WHOLE TRUTH and he meant to say that his kingdom was not of this world then but would be in 2,000 years. This is tantamount to calling Jesus a liar. This is why futurism is so pernicious.

John Nelson Darby was the English apostle of this Jesuit interpretation, and during his long career he spread it throughout the English speaking world. Nelson's interpretation is believed by the majority of "Protestants" today. He did a tremendous job . . . for Rome!!

# 5 is Lord John Russell

Lord John Russell is the last of our fatal five.

He was Prime Minister during the Great Irish Famine and refused all Governmental help to the starving people. His callous answer to that Holocaust was: "Help yourselves and Heaven will help you."

There are some things which the Crown cannot grant, which Parliament cannot enact: these are the spirit of self-reliance and the spirit of co-operation. I must say plainly that I should, indeed despair of this task, were it not that I think I see symptoms in the Irish people both of greater reliance on their own energies and exertions, and of greater intelligence to co-operate with each other . . .

Happy will it be indeed if the Irish themselves take for their maxim "Help yourselves, and Heaven will help you," and then I think they will find there is some use in adversity.

During the American Civil War he was Foreign Secretary of Great Britain under Lord Palmerston. He was constantly urging his Government to recognize the Confederates.

94 Piccadilly - September 14, 1862-

My dear Russell,-The detailed accounts given in the "Observer" to day of the battles of August 29 and 30 between the Confederates and the Federals show that the latter got a very complete smashing ; and it seems not altogether unlikely that still greater disasters await them, and that even Washington or Baltimore may fall into the hands of the Confederates.

If this should happen, would it not be time for us to consider whether in such a state of things England and France might not address the contending parties and recommend an arrangement upon the basis of separation?

Yours sincerely,

Palmerston

Lord Russell replied-

Gotha: September 17, 1862.

My dear Palmerston,- Whether the Federal army is destroyed or not, it is clear that it is driven back to Washington, and has made no progress in subduing the insurgent States. Such being the case, I agree with you that the time is come for offering mediation to the United States Government, with a view to the recognition of the independence of the Confederates. I agree further, that, in case of failure, we ought ourselves to recognise the Southern States as an independent State. For the purpose of taking so important a step, I think we must have a meeting of the Cabinet. The 23rd or 3oth would suit me for the meeting.

We ought then, if we agree on such a step, to propose it first to France, and then, on the part of England and France, to Russia and other powers, as a measure decided upon by us.

We ought to make ourselves safe in Canada, not by sending more troops there, but by concentrating those we have in a few defensible posts before the winter sets in.

I hope to get home on Sunday, but a letter sent to the Foreign Office is sure to reach me.

Yours truly,

Lord Russell

President Lincoln outwitted this fox. . . .In the fall of 1863, he arranged to have the Russian Navy show the flag in New York and San Francisco and their presence was a warning to England and France to stay out.

This is what Queen Victoria said on the demise of her favourite Minister:

"Balmoral: May 30, 1878.

DEAR LADY RUSSELL, —It was only yesterday afternoon that I heard through the papers that your dear husband had left this world of sorrows and trials peacefully and full of years the night before, or I would have telegraphed and written sooner. You will believe that I truly regret an old friend of forty years’ standing, and whose personal kindness in trying and anxious times I shall ever remember. Lord John, as I knew him best, was one of my first and most distinguished Ministers, and his departure recalls many eventful times.

To you, dear Lady Russell, who were ever one of the most devoted of wives, this must be a terrible blow, though you must have for some time been prepared for it. But one is never prepared for the blow when it comes, and you have had such trials and sorrows of late years that I most truly sympathise with you. Your dear and devoted daughter will, I know, be the greatest possible comfort to you, and I trust that your grandsons will grow up to be all you could wish.

"Believe me always, yours affectionately,

VICTORIA R. AND I"

 

Queen Victoria at her crowning had to say the Coronation Oath. Part of the oath says that she believes that:

". . . Masses are fables and dangerous deceits . . . "

Here is what Charles Dickens author of A Christmas Carol and Scrooge fame said about Lord Russell:

"Charles Dickens, speaking in 1869 at a banquet in Liverpool, held in his honour, over which Lord Dufferin presided, refused to allow what he regarded as a covert sneer against the House of Lords to pass unchallenged. He repelled the insinuation with unusual warmth, and laid stress on his own regard for individual members of that assembly. Then, on the spur of the moment, came an unexpected personal tribute. ‘He declared that there was no man in England whom he respected more in his public capacity, loved more in his private capacity, or from whom he had received more remarkable proofs of his honour and love of literature than Lord John Russell.’ The compliment took Lord Russell by surprise; but if space allowed, or necessity claimed, it would be easy to prove that it was not undeserved. From the days of his youth, when he lived under the roof of Dr. Playfair, and attended the classes of Professor Dugald Stewart in Edinburgh, and took his part, as a protégé of Lord Holland, in the brilliant society of Holland House, Lord John's leanings towards literature, and friendship with other literary men had been marked..."

Lord John's personality  was what we call a "cold fish"

"The Hon. Charles Gore, who was also private secretary to Lord John when the latter held the Home Office in the Melbourne Administration, gives in the following words his recollections: ‘Often members of Parliament and others used to come into my room adjoining, after their interview with Lord John, looking, and seeming, much dissatisfied with their reception. His manner was cold and shy, and, even when he intended to comply with the request made, in his answer he rather implied no than yes. He often used to say to me that he liked to hear the laugh which came to him through the door which separated us, as proof that I had been able to soothe the disappointed feelings with which his interviewer had left him’ . . . "

Finally!

Nothing has changed....Thanks to the Ecumenical Movement, Rome has an even greater stranglehold on the British Government than ever before. 5 years ago, all guns were confiscated from the people and no matter how much money you possess you cannot own a firearm for self protection....A man's home is NOT his castle any more!!

References

Blakiston, Noel (Editor), The Roman Question, Chapman and Hall, London, 1962.

Prest, John, Lord John Russell, University of South Carolina Press, 1972.

Reid, Stuart J, Lord John Russell, Sampson Low, Marston & Co., London, 1895.

Walpole, Spencer, The Life of Lord John Russell, in two volumes, Longmans, Green, & Co., London, 1889.

Back to Main Menu